login
Euromoney CountryRisk logo
  • Global Risk Table
  • Countries
  • Analysis
  • About Us
    • About ECR
    • Methodology
    • FAQS
    • Become an Expert
  • Contact Us

ECR chart of the week: Can Abenomics save Japan’s ECR score from converging with China?

Matthew Turner Thursday, March 21, 2013

Analysts cast an upbeat tone on Shinzo Abe’s policies as Euromoney Country Risk data reveal steady decade-long convergence.

 

A comparative snapshot of the ECR scores of Japan and China shows that risk differentials between the two countries have narrowed by only five ECR points during the last 10 years, highlighting the steady convergence in both countries’ risk profiles since 2002.

According to ECR’s global risk rankings, both countries’ score convergence is due to downward pressure on Japan’s creditworthiness rather than an improvement in China’s sovereign rating.

With a global rank of 39, China rose by only eight places in the ECR global rankings since March 2002. In stark contrast, Japan plummeted 19 places during the same period, meaning China and Japan’s positions in the rankings have converged by 31 places over this period.

Japan’s fall is underpinned by deteriorating economic conditions owing to a hefty debt burden and an economy characterized by stagflation and a demographic shock.

Japan’s economic assessment score fell by 2.1 points year/year to 50.3 (out of 100), while the country’s structural assessment score is now just 65.9.

Gross public debt exceeded 200% of GDP in 2009 and is projected to reach around 240% of GDP by the end of next year. Japan will need additional reforms – to its pension system, for example – without which the country might be facing a credit shock. All of these concerns are borne out by its fall in the rankings.

Three of Japan’s economic sub-factors were downgraded last year, led by the bank-stability risk indicator, highlighting concerns about balance-sheet strengths. Yet the economic-GNP outlook and government-finances indicators are the lowest scorers, at 4.0 and 3.1 (out of 10) respectively, testament to the country’s lack of growth and high debt levels.

 

Abenomics

Although Japan’s position in the ECR rankings has plummeted to its lowest level since ECR began its survey in 1993, there are signs that optimism might be creeping back into analysts perceptions, after prime minister Shinzo Abe swept to victory in the December election.

Japan benefited from improvements in the country’s political assessment in Q4, improving by 0.2 points.

Meanwhile, the country’s economic assessment increased by 0.3 points, due to an advancement of the country’s monetary policy indicator, which improved by 0.1 point, suggesting analysts believe that Abe’s policies to reduce real interest rates and devalue the yen will kick-start growth.

However, Japan has a long way to go in regaining its past position in the ECR rankings. On the other hand, more bullish forecasts this quarter suggests Abe is at the right starting point and could lead Japan to the status it once claimed.

This article was originally published by Euromoney Country Risk. To find out more, register for a free trial at Euromoney Country Risk

Recent articles

  • ECR survey results Q3 2022: Political risk is heightened by conflict, inflation and tightening financial conditions

  • ECR survey results Q2 2022: Covid, war and stagflation risks perplex investors

  • ECR survey results Q4 2021: EMs on back-foot as the year ends

  • ECR survey results Q3 2021: CEE shines but Brazil, Nigeria and other EMs recoil from global investing roadblocks

Euromoney CountryRisk logo

The material on this site is for financial institutions, professional investors and their professional advisers. It is for information only. Please read our  Terms & Conditions ,  Privacy Policy and Cookies before using this site.


All material is subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. Euromoney Country Risk is part of the Delinian Group Delinian Limited 8 Bouverie Street London EC4Y 8AX Registered in England and Wales, Company number 00954730 Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

  • Methodology
  • FAQs
  • Articles
  • Contact us
  • Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement